Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Turner v. Crammer et al
as 3:2018cv00520
Plaintiff:
Richard Turner
Defendant:
Lt. Crammer, Sgt. Cole, Officer Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pasley et al v. Crammer et al
as 3:2017cv01085
Plaintiff:
Suntez Pasley, Derek Marshall, Taiwan M. Davis and others
Defendant:
Lt. Crammer, Sgt. Cole, Officer Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Stirling et al
as 9:2017cv02209
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Johnson
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Jonathan Lane, Laura Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian Eaglin v. McCall
as 16-7171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN T. EAGLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MCCALL, Sergeant
Defendant:
LARRY CARTLEDGE, Warden, FLORENCE MAUNEY, Assistant Warden, CURTIS EARLLY and others
Turner v. Collins et al
as 3:2016cv50009
Plaintiff:
Richard Turner
Defendant:
Rosemary Collins and Assistant Prosecuter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Keith Nesbitt v. Tim Riley
as 15-6835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH NESBITT
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM RILEY, Warden, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Directory of the Department of Corrections, AMY SPENCER and others
Perry v. Cartledge et al
as 1:2014cv04796
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Perry
Defendant:
Larry Cartledge, Richard Turner, Leigh Pollman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael L. Jones v. Lieber CI
as 14-7162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, PERRY CI WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE, ASSOC WARDEN FLORENCE MAUNEY and others
Nesbitt v. Riley et al
as 0:2014cv02788
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Defendant:
Tim Riley, Bryan P Stirling, Amy Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Nesbitt v. SC Department of Correction
as 14-6114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH NESBITT
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYGER RIVER CI, TIM RILEY, Warden Tyger River Correctional and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
