Cases 1 - 10 of 105
RICHARDSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00828
Petitioner:
DAQUWON RICHARDSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JONES v. BONNER et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
BONNER, REED, POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TREY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, BRANDY LEEK, ANTHONY BONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. SMALL et al
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
CORY MARTEZ SMITH
Defendant:
GARY SMALL, JESSICA RICHARDSON, CASSANDRA POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLAGG v. TIERNEY et al
as 2:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
JUAN JOSEPH FLAGG
Defendant:
S. TIERNEY, RICHARDSON and C. POPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AUTUMN E. CORDELLIONE A.K.A. JONATHAN C. RICHARDSON v. COMMISSIONER OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
AUTUMN E. CORDELLIONE A.K.A. JONATHAN C. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DARDEN v. MARTINI et al
as 1:2023cv02251
Plaintiff:
JAYDEN DARDEN
Defendant:
KARL MARTINI, BRANHAM, LUTRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORDELLIONE v. GRAY
as 3:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
AUTUMN E. CORDELLIONE, RICHARDSON C. JONATHAN and JONATHAN C. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
TONY GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. GARDENER et al
as 1:2023cv01975
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MARSHALL
Defendant:
GARDENER, BOGGS, BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLAGG v. VANVLEET et al
as 2:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
JUAN JOSEPH FLAGG
Defendant:
R. VANVLEET, S. TIERNEY, RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
