Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jackson v. Gladieux et al
as 1:2020cv00446
Defendant:
David J Gladieux, M Vachon, A Malloris and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Hang et al
as 3:2019cv01191
Plaintiff:
Robert Hatcher and Robert Lee Jackson
Defendant:
Ronald Hang and Joshua Brisbane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hatcher v. Hang et al
as 3:2019cv01182
Plaintiff:
Robert Hatcher and Robert Lee Jackson
Defendant:
Ronald Hang and Joshua Brisbane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hatcher v. Hang et al
as 3:2019cv01170
Plaintiff:
Robert Hatcher and Robert Lee Jackson
Defendant:
Ronald Hang and Joshua Brisbane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv00234
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Jackson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner v. Jackson
as 1:2011cv06338
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jerome Gardner
Defendant:
Robert Lee Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Jackson, Jr. v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 10-12008
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE JACKSON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
JACKSON v. CRIST
as 5:2009cv00483
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Jackson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. CRIST
as 4:2009cv00146
Petitioner:
ROBERT LEE JACKSON, JR
Respondent:
CHARLIE CRIST
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2007cv00407
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
