Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Young v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Cedric Orlando Young
Defendant:
Bonner, S Mitchell, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCreary v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Roger Lee McCreary
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Rogers (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
James Leslie Bailey
Defendant:
Captain Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caswell v. Horton et al
as 4:2023cv01380
Defendant:
Cassi R Peek, Kristen Ward, Sheriff Jonathon Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Caswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. D.O.C. State of Alabama
as 2:2023cv01222
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Ernest Rogers
Defendant:
D.O.C. State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Rogers et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
James Leslie Bailey
Defendant:
Captain Rogers, Captain Norman and Brian Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2023cv00898
Plaintiff:
Alcaliph Woodard
Defendant:
Domingo Gonzales, Terrance Davis, Chris Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Davis et al
as 6:2023cv00744
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Carr
Respondent:
Gwendolyn Davis, Steve Marshall and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. Paul et al
as 1:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Alcaliph Woodard
Defendant:
Jason Paul, Justin Cooper, Michael L Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
