Cases 1 - 10 of 413
Charles v. USA
as 1:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Roger Dale Charles, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant:
T.A. WEAVIL, DANNY ROGERS, VERONICA L. EDMINSTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. USA
as 3:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
Mario Reginald Rogers
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ford v. Stone et al
as 5:2024ct03001
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Keith Stone, Sheriff Bond Surety, Major Allen Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Greene et al
as 5:2023ct03332
Plaintiff:
Joshua Johnson
Defendant:
Steadman Jody Greene, William Rogers, Bernetta Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILKERSON v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2023cv00962
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP WILKERSON
Defendant:
DARYL JACKSON and DANNY ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bias et al v. Skillet Catering Service
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Michael Spencer Bias, Daniel Hinson, Kenneth Peyton and others
Defendant:
Skillet Catering Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Wyatt et al
as 5:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Shelby Wyatt, Jonathan Call, FNU Tilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYCE v. USDC JUDGES BETTY PUGH
as 1:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
USDC JUDGES BETTY PUGH, ANGELA MOORE, HENRY ROGERS, JR-SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
United States of America, FNU LNU, Max O. Cogburn, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
