Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Tripp v. Damguard et al
as 4:2023cv04105
Petitioner:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Respondent:
Judge Natalie Damguard, Judge Robbin J. Howman, Thomas Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reddy v. Fluke et al
as 5:2023cv05009
Petitioner:
Justin S. Reddy, Sr.
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Looks Twice v. Williamson et al
as 4:2022cv04157
Plaintiff:
David Stephan Looks Twice and Kurt Douglas Andrews
Defendant:
Lori Williamson, Sara Jo Kegler, Dan Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rindahl v. Malsam-Rysdon et al
as 4:2022cv04073
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Defendant:
Kim Malsam-Rysdon, Joan Adam, Kristi Noem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Shaw v. Wasko et al
as 4:2022cv04054
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Shaw
Defendant:
Kelly Wasko, Dan Sullivan, Brent Fluke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutko v. Yankton FPC, Warden
as 4:2021cv04115
Respondent:
Yankton FPC, Warden
Petitioner:
Nereus S. Sutko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tranmer v. Yankton FPC, Warden
as 4:2021cv04089
Respondent:
Yankton FPC, Warden
Petitioner:
Adam S Tranmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rindahl v. Noem et al
as 4:2020cv04176
Defendant:
M. Liedholt, L. Lenter, A. Madsen and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Cox et al
as 4:2020cv04130
Defendant:
Dr. Rock Boyd, Dr. William Pierce, Legal Dept L. Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripp v. Augustine et al
as 4:2020cv04116
Defendant:
John Benting, Richard Vestlie, Michael Leidhotl and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
