Cases 1 - 10 of 359
Kelly v. Milam et al
as 2:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Brent Tyler Kelly
Defendant:
J. L. Milam, Daniel P. White, A. W. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dixon v. Lovett
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Damarcus Da'shaun Dixon
Defendant:
Mr. S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Thompson v. Wilshire
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Maurice-Edward: Thompson
Defendant:
S. Wilshire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Lovett
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Damarcus Da'shaun Dixon
Defendant:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Love v. Flowers et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Love
Defendant:
Brandon S. Flowers A.U.S.A., F.C.I Hazelton Warden Rey, F.C.I. Hazelton S.I.S. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stout v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott Stout
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Vashun Lewis
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Michael Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Honaker v. Rose et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Gerald Leon Honaker
Defendant:
Sgt. W. E. Rose, Dep. J. A. Brooks, Dep. M. S. Altice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Love v. Flowers et al
as 3:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jerry Dean Love
Respondent:
A.U.S.A. Brandon S. Flowers and U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of West Virginia at Clarksburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
