Cases 1 - 10 of 17
(PC) Tompkins v. Thomas et al
as 2:2022cv01964
Plaintiff:
Shawn Marshall Tompkins
Defendant:
S Thomas, C. Layshot, M. Muro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Tompkins v. Thomas et al
as 1:2022cv01415
Plaintiff:
Shawn Marshall Tompkins
Defendant:
S Thomas, C. Layshot, M. Muro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Wilson v. Meritt, et al.
as 1:2022cv00455
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Wilson
Defendant:
Lura Meritt, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison at Corcoran, Public Entity of CDCR in Corcoran Calif and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Meritt et al
as 4:2022cv02396
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Wilson
Defendant:
Lura Meritt, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison at Corcoran, Public Entity of CDCR in Corcoran Calif and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Glass v. CDCR et al
as 1:2020cv00768
Defendant:
J. Beals, S. Thomas, J. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Glass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Glass v. CDCR et al
as 2:2020cv01123
Defendant:
J. Beals, S. Thomas, J. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Glass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Avila v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2017cv02701
Defendant:
Patrick Allen, Patrick Allen, Brian Alley and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Avila
Thomas v. Sutton
as 1:2017cv00205
Petitioner:
Michael S. Thomas
Respondent:
John Sutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthews v. Thomas, et al
as 2:2016cv02834
Plaintiff:
Dwight Matthews
Defendant:
S Thomas, J Oldham, Lea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Avila v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2013cv04265
Defendant:
Dep. Patrick Allen, Dep. Patrick Allen, Lt. E. Alvarez and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Avila
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
