Cases 1 - 10 of 444
Brown v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Brown
Defendant:
Nelson Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Hicks
as 3:2024cv00344
Petitioner:
Waytayha Scott
Respondent:
Tikki M. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Van Huisen v. House of Representatives, et al
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Greg Van Huisen and Gregory Scott VanHuisen
Defendant:
House of Representatives, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Jenkins et al
as 7:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
David F. Brown
Defendant:
Scott Jenkins, Dale Durrer, Carson Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Medical Unit et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Campbell
Defendant:
Medical Unit, Officer Freeman and Sgt Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Richmond City Justice Center et al
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Campbell
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center, Officer Tylor and Officer Mertaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacques, Patrick v. Captain Bowles et al
as 7:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Defendant:
Captain Bowles, S. Scott, Counselor Calton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pierce v. Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00083
Petitioner:
Scott Matthew Pierce
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Scott, Jr
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
