Cases 1 - 10 of 236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jackson v. American Municipal Services et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jackson
Defendant:
American Municipal Services, Larry Bergman, Greg Pitchman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jones v. Department of Health
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Jones
Defendant:
Department of Health, Eastern Louisiana Mental Health Systems, Turn Key Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. LSP Investigation Service et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Eric McCall
Defendant:
LSP Investigation Service, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aikens v. Marshal Service
as 1:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewayne Aikens
Defendant:
U S Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
De La Miya v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Kerry Salas De La Miya
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00166
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
