Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rufus v. Weigle et al
as 3:2023cv04421
Plaintiff:
Michael Alonza Rufus
Defendant:
Charles H. Weigle, Shiva V. Hodges, Paige J. Gossett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
GOODE v. ZALESKI et al
as 2:2023cv02506
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
THOMAS M. ZALESKI, WILLIAM J. KNECHT, SHIVA RAJA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODE v. WERNER et al
as 2:2023cv02109
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
BRIAN WERNER, THOMAS ROLA, JR, P/O NELL J CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODE v. A-CRUZ et al
as 2:2023cv02104
Petitioner:
RONALD GOODE
Respondent:
A-CRUZ, THOMAS M. ZALESKI, BRIAN WERNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lawrence Crawford v. Robert Hood
as 17-7410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE CRAWFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE ROBERT E. HOOD, TARA DAWN SHURLING, P.A., JUDGE ALBERT DIAZ and others
Yahya Muquit v. Robert Hood
as 17-7068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YAHYA MUQUIT
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. HOOD, Judge, TARA DAWN SHURLING, Ms, PA, JUDGE ALBERT DIAZ and others
Nathanael Reynolds v. Shiva Hodges, et al
as 16-5152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nathanael Lenard Reynolds
Defendant - Appellee:
Shiva V. Hodges, Magistrate Judge, Mary Geiger Lewis, Judge and United States District Court for the District of South Carolina
REYNOLDS v. HODGES et al
as 1:2016cv00895
Plaintiff:
NATHANAEL L. REYNOLDS
Defendant:
SHIVA V. HODGES, MARY GEIGER LEWIS and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniels v. Hodges et al
as 2:2014cv04636
Plaintiff:
Kevin W McDaniels
Defendant:
Shiva Hodges and Derham Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaun Ramroop v. USA
as 11-15018
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAUN SHIVA RAMROOP
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
