Cases 1 - 10 of 38
STYLES v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2023cv03755
Plaintiff:
TYREEK STYLES
Defendant:
WARDEN ORTIZ, WARDEN MARLER, CAPTAIN NASH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2023cv01202
Plaintiff:
Iklas R. Davis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Staff of FCI-Schuylkill, Warden Beth Rickard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hernandez v. Keeney et al
as 1:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Pagan Hernandez
Defendant:
Lt. Keeney, Lt. Barrett, Warden Sage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Aguilar v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Oscar Contreras Aguilar
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, JOHN DOE, SIA Canfield and others
Johnson, Sr. v. USP-Canaan et al
as 1:2021cv01751
Plaintiff:
Dietrick Lewis Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
USP-Canaan, Warden Bradley, Counselor Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Puckett v. USP-Lewisburg Administration/Staff et al
as 3:2021cv01172
Defendant:
Special Investigative Agent Knapp, Associate Warden Rokosky, USP Lewisburg Administration/Staff and others
Plaintiff:
James B Puckett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THOMAS v. MARTYNUSKA et al
as 3:2020cv00181
Defendant:
P.A. GOLDEN, C.O. JOZWIAK, LT. ROBISON and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR DARNELL THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Folks v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2020cv01101
Defendant:
Warden Spaulding, SIS Ordonez and Sia J. Fosnot
Plaintiff:
Malik Folks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goodwin v. Hawk-Sawyer et al
as 1:2020cv00606
Defendant:
Darrin Howard, DHO Bittenbender, Warden H Quay and others
Plaintiff:
Joal William Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doss v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2019cv01789
Defendant:
Warden Lane, Lt. O'Connor, Chaplain Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Doss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
