Cases 1 - 10 of 23
BEARD v. TICE
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
DYLAN J. BEARD
Defendant:
ERIC TICE, CHRISTIE WEIGLE and SMART COMMUNICATIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HOUSMAN v. SMART COMMUNICATION et al
as 2:2022cv01264
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOWARD HOUSMAN
Defendant:
SMART COMMUNICATION/PADOC, GEORGE LITTLE, MS. KOIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv01337
Plaintiff:
Jamiel L. Williams
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Smart Communications, Mr. Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv01145
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR CLARK
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY doing business as ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, ORLANDO L. HARPER, JASON BEASOM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
HINES v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2021cv05203
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. HINES, III
Defendant:
TAMMY FERGUSON, MANDY SIPPLE, C.E.R.T. JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS-BEY v. SMART et al
as 2:2021cv01578
Defendant:
SMART and SARPONG
Plaintiff:
TYRONE LEWIS-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Respondent:
Pharmatech Laboratory, C.O.1 Bullick, Fidel Clark(c)TM and others
Petitioner:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pew v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00668
Defendant:
Shawn P Kenny, Dorina Varner, Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Defendant:
CO 1 L.M. McGinnis, Gregory Redden, CO 1 Kyler and others
Plaintiff:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2019cv02097
Petitioner:
Fabian D. Smart
Respondent:
PA Attorney General and Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
