Cases 1 - 10 of 849
Locklear v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority et al
as 7:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Locklear
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority, A.J. Smith and Tamala Gillespie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Holbrook et al
as 7:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Lantz Domoench Day
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Jessee Holbrook, Dr. McDuffie, Ms. Brookshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Smith
as 2:2024cv00378
Petitioner:
Lawrence E. Thompson, Jr.
Respondent:
Nelson Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Smith
Defendant:
R. Owens, B. Dotson, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Targonsk et al
as 2:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Smith
Defendant:
Targonsk, S. Herrick, G. Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Curtis Leroy Floyd
Defendant:
Happy Smith, Rick White, P. Sykes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Timothy R. Smith
Respondent:
Unknown and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chavis v. Holbrook et al
as 7:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jaeon Chavis
Defendant:
Lea Holbrook, Dr. Happy Smith, Red Onion State Prison Medical Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M.L. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
M.L., E.W. and S.W.
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Colette Peters, Christopher Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Crosby v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Crosby
Defendant:
Larry Collins, David Robinson, Randall Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
