Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Spottswood v. State of MN Wash Co, The et al
as 0:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Shawn Clarke Spottswood
Defendant:
The State of MN Wash Co, Zoom and State of MN Wash Co, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grande v. State of MN et al
as 0:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ryan Grande
Defendant:
State of MN, Saint Peter Regional Treatment Center and State of MN Dept. of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Centurion of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02971
Plaintiff:
Stephan Nicholas Holmes
Defendant:
Centurion of Minnesota, MN DOC, State of MN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. State of MN
as 0:2022cv00740
Petitioner:
Miyo M. Alexander
Respondent:
State of MN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. State of MN et al
as 0:2021cv01811
Petitioner:
Adairan Martell Davis
Respondent:
State of MN, Henn. Co., Kevin Beiging and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lacy v. DOC State of MN, Minneasota
as 0:2020cv01376
Petitioner:
Harold Lacy
Defendant:
DOC State of MN, Minneasota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grande v. State of MN et al
as 0:2018cv02904
Defendant:
Dr. William Ericson, Emily Piper Johnson, Dr. Thomas Gratzer and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ryan Grande
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ul Mahbub v. Warden, Rush City Prison et al
as 0:2017cv04908
Petitioner:
Maksud Ul Mahbub
Respondent:
Warden, Rush City Prison , John Choi , Lori Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holsapple v. Roy et al
as 0:2012cv01117
Petitioner:
Brian John Holsapple
Respondent:
Thomas Roy and State of MN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stephen Michael Michuda v. State of MN Board of Public, et al
as 11-3261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stephen Michael Michuda
Defendant - Appellee:
State of MN Board of Public Defense, John Stuart, State of MN Public Defender's Office and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
