Cases 1 - 10 of 1,795
THOMPSON v. FORSYTH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv00973
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY JAIL and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jessiah Hubbard v. State of North Carolina
as 24-7100
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Petitioner:
JESSIAH JAMES HUBBARD
Hinton v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2024hc02205
Petitioner:
Charles Everette Hinton
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Pender Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrow v. State of North Carolina
as 1:2024cv00939
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Petitioner:
JONTEVIOUS MORROW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TYLER v. CITY OF WINSTON SALEM et al
as 1:2024cv00931
Defendant:
JOSHUA GENTILE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY OF FORSYTH and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Knox et al
as 3:2024cv00972
Defendant:
C. Anderson, Ana Dowdy, S. Eason and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'Neal Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02198
Petitioner:
Jontevious Morrow
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Claude Stevens v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6985
Petitioner:
CLAUDE MORDECIA STEVENS
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Johnson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02186
Petitioner:
CQuwan Darell Johnson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOLMAN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00834
Petitioner:
SADA NALETTE HOLMAN
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
