Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Steele (PS) v. Stencil et al
as 1:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Brandon T. Steele
Defendant:
Andre Moses Stencil and Jared Polis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele (PS) v. Choates
as 1:2023cv03209
Petitioner:
Omar Alberto Steele
Respondent:
Jonny Choates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steele (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv01792
Plaintiff:
Lamar Ray Steele and Lamar Ray Steele, Jr.
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv01158
Petitioner:
Omar Alberto Steele
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ernesto Santa Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Scott v. Dziedzic et al
as 1:2018cv02602
Plaintiff:
Lynn Eugene Scott
Defendant:
Kelly Dziedzic, Daniel Steele and Chris Stadler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steele v. Boyd et al
as 1:2016cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jason D. Steele
Defendant:
Boyd, Shark, Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hankins v. Husband et al
as 1:2011cv02224
Plaintiff:
Terence J. Hankins
Defendant:
John (I) E. Husband, John E. Husband, Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perales et al v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2011cv02172
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Respondent:
United States Internal Revenue Service, USA, U.S. Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hankins v. Hankins et al
as 1:2010cv03172
Plaintiff:
Terence J. Hankins
Defendant:
Tim (I) Jantz, Tim Jantz, Walter (I) VanEtta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rueb et al v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv02726
Plaintiff:
Justin Rueb and Jacob Oakley
Defendant:
Aristedes Zavaras, Eugene Atherton, Crandell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
