Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
MENZIE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00506
Plaintiff: RONALD E. MENZIE
Defendant: ERIC HOLCOMB, CITY OF NEW CASTLE, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CABLE v. HOLCOMB et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JAMES CABLE
Defendant: ERIC HOLCOMB, INDIANA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE, INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLINGSWORTH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2021cv00205
Defendant: MIKE RAINS d/b/a, Putnamville Correctional Facility, Deputy Warden, TODD ROKITA d/b/a, Indiana Attorney General, ERIC HOLCOMB d/b/a, Governor and others
Plaintiff: SHAQUILLE HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00225
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
SLUSSER v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2017cv00779
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner: RODNEY R. SLUSSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JUDD v. OBAMA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00351
Defendant: DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF INDIANA, BARACK OBAMA and SECRETARY OF STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff: KEITH JUDD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01330
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
CLARK-ERSKINE v. SECRETARY OF STATE et al
as 1:2008cv01634
Petitioner: JEREMY D. CLARK-ERSKINE
Respondent: SECRETARY OF STATE and SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?