Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Council et al v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council, Kinetik Justice, Lee Edward Moore, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Leigh Gwathney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Wexford et al
as 1:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
Steven D. King
Defendant:
Wexford, Supervisor Murphy, Nurse Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Davis et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00759
Plaintiff:
Christopher Norris Simmons
Defendant:
Ann Davis, Kathy Garris and Chilton County Jail Admin.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billingsley v. Cook et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00130
Defendant:
Captain Golden, CO 1 Simmon and Warden Cook
Plaintiff:
Jerry Donald Billingsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faison v. G.K. Fountain Atmore, AL et al
as 1:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Mrs. Simmons, Ms. Adams, G.K. Fountain Atmore, AL and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney P. Faison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2020cv00563
Defendant:
Sgt. Clark, Jenny John, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Jerome Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Harrelson et al
as 1:2020cv00169
Plaintiff:
Raney Simmons
Defendant:
Chris Summers and Kevin Harrelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steiger v. Simmons(INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00599
Defendant:
United States Probation Office, Derrick Cunningham and Marcus Simmons
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph Steiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
