Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Prestel v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 3:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dean Prestel
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, County of Mcintosh, Kevin Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. State of Texas
as 4:2020cv01065
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis Ward
Defendant:
State of Texas, State of Missouri, State of New Mexico and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Rondale R. Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hester v. United States of America et al.
as 4:2020cv00066
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, State Of Texas, Special Agent Jenifer Sparks and others
Plaintiff:
Tyton Hester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. State of Oklahoma
as 7:2018cv00169
Petitioner:
William Jay Clark
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McAdams v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv02059
Petitioner:
Don McAdams
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martin v. U.S. of A et al
as 3:2018cv00976
Respondent:
U.S. of A, State of Oklahoma and NFN Bear
Petitioner:
Dennis Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cotner v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv00312
Petitioner:
Robert Cotner
Respondent:
United States of America and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hurt et al v. The State of Oklahoma et al
as 1:2016cv00087
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt and African Americans
Defendant:
The State of Oklahoma and Whites in The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cotner v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 3:2013cv02668
Petitioner:
Robert Cotner
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Warden McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Strong v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2011cv00347
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Strong
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Mary Fallin, C. Steven Kessinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
