Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Avery et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2015cv00252
Plaintiff:
Steven Avery, Nathan Maulding, Steven Ingrahm and others
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Avery v. Kenneth Kratz, et al
as 12-3467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN AVERY
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH KRATZ, in his official and individual capacity, JOHN DEDERING, in his official and individual capacity, WILLIAM TYSON, in his official and individual capacity and others
Avery v. Manitowoc County et al
as 2:2012cv00193
Plaintiff:
Steven Avery
Defendant:
Manitowoc County, Wendy Baldwin, Kenneth Kratz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Pagel et al
as 2:2012cv00192
Plaintiff:
Steven Avery
Defendant:
Gerald A Pagel, John Byrnes, Gary Hemauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Calumet County et al
as 2:2012cv00071
Plaintiff:
Steven Avery
Defendant:
Calumet County, Kenneth Kratz, Peggy A Lautenschlager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Wiegert et al
as 2:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
Steven Avery
Defendant:
Mark Wiegert, Kenneth Kratz, Wendy Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Kratz et al
as 1:2011cv01093
Plaintiff:
Steven Avery
Defendant:
Kenneth Kratz, John Dedering, William Tyson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Farley
as 11-3533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric Farley, Correction Officer at Five Points Correctional Facility, Kyler Kennedy, Correction Officer at Five Points Correctional Facility, Barry Countryman, Correction Officer at Five Points Correctional Facility and others
Abreu v. Farley, et al.
as 6:2011cv06251
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Eric Farley, Robert Maloy, Kyler Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
