Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Knighton v. Martinez et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Defendant:
E Abedinovic, T Martinez, NFN Llamas and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Knighton, Zachary Jared Louis Knighton, Jared Louis Knighton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Buckel et al
as 3:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Mychal Reed
Defendant:
A. Buckel, S. Steadman, T. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Reed v. Buckel, et al.
as 1:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Mychal Reed
Defendant:
A Buckel, S. Steadman, T Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. Turner et al
as 2:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Cedric McNeal and Cedric Dewayne McNeal
Defendant:
A Turner, T Martinez and Wade T Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tran v. Martinez
as 3:2023cv01677
Plaintiff:
Ba T. Tran
Defendant:
T. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doyle Davis v. James Corcoran, et al
as 22-55959
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOYLE WAYNE DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES CORCORAN, Correctional Officer, J. PULIDO, Correctional Officer, R. SKOG, Correctional Officer and others
Slate v. Nelson
as 2:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
John Nekita Slate
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin, T Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Renteria v. Cuevas et al
as 3:2021cv01507
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dave Renteria
Defendant:
Cuevas, Byrnes, Kako and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McCullock v. Scharr et al
as 3:2019cv02110
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, C.D. Smith, N. Scharr and others
Plaintiff:
Robert McCullock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Williams v. Kenner et al
as 3:2018cv01006
Plaintiff:
Lance Williams
Defendant:
M. Kenner, P. Gonzalez, E. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
