Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Atkins et al.
as 3:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Donald Parker
Defendant:
Deputy T. Atkins, Portsmouth City Jail and Portsmouth Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Sturgill et al
as 7:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
M.D. Sturgill, K.P. King, T. Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00182
Defendant:
M. D. Sturgill, David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryor v. Atkins et al
as 3:2021cv00528
Defendant:
T. Atkins, Major Whalen, Counselor Parrott and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Pryor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armour v. Atkins et al
as 3:2020cv00911
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, T. Atkins, Russell Goins and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Armour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2020cv00237
Defendant:
T. Atkins, D. Brookhart, C/O Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State of California et al
as 3:2016cv06897
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Johnson
Defendant:
State of California, California Deparment of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Warden at Salinas State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanegas v. Atkins et al
as 1:2014cv00321
Plaintiff:
Jose D. Vanegas
Defendant:
Michael T. Atkins, Peter Fedyszen, David Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
