Cases 1 - 10 of 152
Tatum v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04025
Petitioner:
Steven Tatum
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tatum v. Parrish et al
as 4:2023cv02873
Plaintiff:
Steven Tatum
Defendant:
Officer Parrish, Judge Don Strickland and Houston Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. JPS Health Network et al
as 4:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Dillon Flores
Defendant:
JPS Health Network, Dr. Shaw, Dr. Tatum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glass v. John Peter Smith Hospital et al
as 4:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Edward Benton Glass
Defendant:
John Peter Smith Hospital, FNU Shaw, All Nurse Practicioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty v. Garrido et al
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Adolphus Petty
Defendant:
Warden FNU Garrido, FNU Swan, FNU McMannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Batastini et al
as 6:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gray
Defendant:
Ashley B Batastini, FNU Madrano, FNU Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pursell v. Tatum et al
as 4:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wade Pursell
Defendant:
Lewis Tatum, Kenneth Dean, Wanda Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pursell v. Tatum et al
as 3:2022cv01921
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Pursell
Defendant:
Lewis Tatum, Kenneth Dean and Wanda Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moses v. LaSalle Correctional Corp LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Leanthony Moses
Defendant:
LaSalle Correctional Corp LLC, FNU Parks, FNU Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandoval v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
