Cases 1 - 10 of 13
SMITH v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv00973
Petitioner:
JAMES THOMAS SMITH
Respondent:
ERIC ARMEL, JOSH SHAPIRO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRAHAM v. PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS CENTER et al
as 3:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA D. GRAHAM
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS CENTER, RICHARD K. DOTSON, MORIS RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Bruns et al
as 3:2018cv01060
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Theodore D. Bruns and Claire Cardwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PRITCHETT v. SMITH
as 1:2011cv00209
Plaintiff:
JAMES PRITCHETT
Defendant:
THOMAS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Pennsylvania Bureau of Corrections
as 3:2007cv02124
Plaintiff:
Dewitt Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Bureau of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Buffalo State Hospital et al
as 3:2007cv01820
Plaintiff:
Dewitt Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Buffalo State Hospital and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Harrett et al
as 3:2007cv01801
Plaintiff:
Dewitt Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Mrs. Harrett, Ines Rossie Covnston, Mr. Rozoto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. North American Railways et al
as 3:2007cv01695
Plaintiff:
Dewitt Thomas Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
North American Railways, Chief Director and Sen. Field et #6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Vanguard Corporation Page R2ET
as 3:2007cv01637
Plaintiff:
Dewitt Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Vanguard Corporation Page R2ET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Watchtown Bible Association
as 3:2007cv01642
Plaintiff:
Dewitt Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Watchtown Bible Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
