Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Thompson v. Rosario et al
as 4:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
William V Thompson
Defendant:
Victoria Rosario and Toby Underwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eppler et al v. Ryan
as 3:2018cv08229
Plaintiff:
Chad A Coker, Anthony Gaines, Robert Sedova and others
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boles v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv02712
Defendant:
Sherri Lauritano, Phoenix Police Department Professional Standards Bureau, Michael Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Sky Boles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez-Torres et al v. Rosales et al
as 2:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramon Martinez-Torres and Araceli Toruga
Defendant:
Richard Lee Rosales, Unknown Rosales, Scott Nikolaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Yuma Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv00884
Plaintiff:
Toby Bolden Williams
Defendant:
Yuma Police Department, M Preciado, A Juarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Yuma County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2014cv01272
Plaintiff:
Toby Bolden Williams
Defendant:
Yuma County Sheriff's Office and Yuma County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Speas et al
as 2:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lewis
Defendant:
Toby Speas and Unknown Mullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dudley v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2008cv02168
Plaintiff:
Damian Dudley
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joe Arpaio, Andrew Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Masse v. Miller et al
as 2:2008cv00823
Plaintiff:
Toby J Masse
Defendant:
James Miller, James Miller, A Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Masse v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2008cv00138
Plaintiff:
Toby J Masse
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, James Miller, Brian Goddard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
