Cases 1 - 10 of 39
SCUDDER v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00677
Petitioner:
TAMMY J. SCUDDER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
RICHARDSON v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TREY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, BRANDY LEEK, ANTHONY BONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HUGHES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CHARLENE BURKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCIS v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
DONALD FRANCIS
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE, CHARLEY FUNK, CASEY LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAMB v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
ANDREW LAMB
Defendant:
TAMMY DAVIS, JOEY LAUGHLIN, LENORD BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
TAYLOR v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
KEVIN TAYLOR
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., BRUCE LEMMON, EDWIN BUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Jail Staff et al
as 3:2021cv00822
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lopez, Jr
Defendant:
Jail Staff and Tammy Cambell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marks v. Miami County Jail Staff et al
as 3:2021cv00787
Plaintiff:
John Daniuel Marks and John D Marks
Defendant:
Miami County Jail Staff and Tammy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stambaugh v. Campbell et al
as 3:2021cv00694
Plaintiff:
Frank Stambaugh, Frank E Stambaugh and Frank Edward Stambaugh
Defendant:
Kim, Tammy Campbell and Jin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
