Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Malone v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00277
Plaintiff:
William A Malone
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Jacqueline Lashbrook, Thomas A Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. IDOC et al
as 3:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
William A Malone
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, Thomas A Spiller, Assistant Warden Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robin Smith v. Donald Gaetz, et al
as 15-2340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBIN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD GAETZ, CHRISTINE BROWN, Health Care Unit Administrator, VIPIN K. SHAH, Doctor and others
Norwood v. Godinez et al
as 3:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
Lamont Norwood
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Thomas Spiller, Terri Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Crisp v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-41210
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRY BRYANT CRISP
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Norwood v. Godinez et al
as 3:2014cv01165
Plaintiff:
Lamont Norwood
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Thomas Spiller, Terri Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haywood et al v. Godinez et al
as 3:2014cv01027
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Thomas Spilller, Terri Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Seyon Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hines v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00529
Plaintiff:
Montorio C Hines
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, S A Godinez, Rick Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Donald Gaetz et al
as 3:2013cv00220
Plaintiff:
Robin Smith
Defendant:
Donald Gaetz, Christine Brown, Vipin Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crisp v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2011cv00557
Petitioner:
Terry Bryant Crisp
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
