Cases 1 - 10 of 15
LOISEL v. CLINTON et al
as 1:2019cv00081
Plaintiff:
MATHIEW LOISEL
Defendant:
RICHARD LIBERTY and ROBERT CLINTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLLINS et al v. LIBERTY et al
as 1:2018cv00435
Undetermined:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Defendant:
PHILIP HODGDON, ERIC MCVAY, RANDALL LIBERTY and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUAL COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLADU v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00504
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS A GLADU
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, ROBERT CLINTON, CINDY MCDONNOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. DR CLINTON et al
as 2:2017cv00409
Plaintiff:
KARLA K WILSON
Defendant:
DR CLINTON and WENDI REIBE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROSS v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2017cv00297
Plaintiff:
BRANDON M GROSS
Defendant:
SCOTT R LANDRY, GLEAN BROWN, SUSAN CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2016cv00398
Plaintiff:
WALTER WILLIAM MOORE
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARTIN MAGNUSSEN, JOESEPH FITSPATRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BISHOP v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00172
Plaintiff:
HARRY C BISHOP, III
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC, WENDY RIEBE, ROBERT CLINTON, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLADU v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 2:2015cv00384
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS A GLADU
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, ROBERT J CLINTON, GEORGE STOCKWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESPOSITO v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2015cv00263
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A ESPOSITO
Defendant:
SCOTT LANDRY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, WENDY RIEBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WORTHLEY v. LNU, CINDY et al
as 2:2015cv00226
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WORTHLEY
Defendant:
LNU, CINDY, DENISE SHIPMAN, THAYER, SGT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
