Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Peoples v. Givens et al
as 2:2022cv00767
Petitioner:
Kevin Waide Peoples
Respondent:
Givens and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peoples v. Bahakel et al
as 5:2020cv00492
Defendant:
Roy Moore, T Todd, Robert Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Quincy Peoples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. Peoples et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00113
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Lawrence
Defendant:
Sgt Peoples, Alan Syler, Dennis Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker v. St Clair County et al
as 4:2017cv00282
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Booker
Defendant:
St Clair County, Peoples and Palmer
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peoples v. White et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00597
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Doniel Peoples
Defendant:
Mickey White, Alabama Department of Corrections, Patrice Richie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peoples v. Estes et al
as 2:2015cv01065
Petitioner:
Kevin Waide Peoples
Respondent:
DeWayne Estes and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peoples v. Roe et al
as 4:2012cv03607
Plaintiff:
Steven Dwayne Peoples
Defendant:
Roe and Southern Health Partners Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gabriel Lopez v. The People Of The State Of California
as 1:2012cv00067
Petitioner:
Gabriel Lopez
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gabriel Lopez v. The People Of The State Of California
as 1:2012cv00065
Petitioner:
Gabriel Lopez
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peoples v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 4:2011cv03464
Plaintiff:
Robert Peoples
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Colleen Oakes and William Talley
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
