Cases 1 - 10 of 277
Thomas v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00181
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Petitioner:
Charles Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Church v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00451
Petitioner:
Thomas Jefferson Church
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brandon et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00265
Defendant:
Anne Thomas, William K. Marshall and Ronald Arnold
Plaintiff:
Harold Midkiff and Chester Brandon, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00362
Petitioner:
Lionel A. Thomas
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
Charles Thomas
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sheppheard et al v. Justice et al
as 5:2023cv00530
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sheppheard, Tyler Randall, Adam Perry and others
Defendant:
James C. Justice, Jr. and Mark Sorsaia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Damron v. Rays et al
as 3:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Thomas Damron
Defendant:
H. Rays, A. Messenger, Oslin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Winston v. USA
as 1:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
Thomas Winston
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Thomas v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00144
Petitioner:
Lionel Thomas
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Santonia v. Ramsey et al
as 2:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Thomas Santonia
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Dallas Ramsey, Correctional Officer Johnny Wilson, Correctional Officer Michael Petrosky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
