Cases 1 - 10 of 13
SINGH v. RUSSO
as 2:2021cv00047
Respondent:
Acting Secretary CHAD WOLF, William Barr, MICHAEL M. RUSSO and others
Petitioner:
GURPREET SINGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OSADOLOR OSADOLOR v. WOLF et al
as 2:2020cv15725
Respondent:
Acting Secretary CHAD WOLF, DHS, H.O. THOMAS DECKER and others
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Osadolor Osadolor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AVENDADO-PALACIOS v. DECKER et al
as 1:2020cv05976
Respondent:
THOMAS DECKER, Acting Secretary CHAD WOLF and STEVEN AHRENDT
Petitioner:
Michel AVENDADO-PALACIOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ojo v. Decker et al
as 2:2020cv05538
Defendant:
Corecivic, Inc., Paul Borke, Thomas Michael Flynn and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORNEJO v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2020cv04580
Respondent:
Acting Secretary CHAD WOLF, THOMAS DECKER, RON EDWARDS and others
Petitioner:
Noe Cornejo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
THOMAS et al v. DECKER et al
as 2:2019cv19302
Respondent:
Medical Defendants (John Doe), H.O. THOMAS DECKER and Hudson County Corrections & Rehabilitation (Jail) Warden
Petitioner:
YUSUF RAHEEM, NATA S. BOB and KENNETH THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raheem v. Decker et al
as 2:2019cv19300
Petitioner:
YUSUF RAHEEM
Respondent:
Hudson County Corrections & Rehabilitation (Jail) Warden, Medical Defendants (John Doe) and H.O. THOMAS DECKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pacheco Uzho v. McAleena et al
as 2:2019cv18559
Respondent:
H.O. THOMAS DECKER, WILLIAM P. BARR, Kevin McAleena and others
Petitioner:
Juan Manual Pacheco Uzho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Golding v. Barr
as 2:2019cv16977
Respondent:
THOMAS DECKER and Attorney General WILLIAM BARR
Petitioner:
Karim Golding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ARGUETA ANARIBA v. DECKER et al
as 2:2019cv09135
Defendant:
RONALD P. EDWARDS, THOMAS DECKER, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN and others
Petitioner:
ANGEL ARGUETA ANARIBA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
