Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montgomery v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2023cv00022
Petitioner:
Toby Lawrence Montgomery
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rankin et al v. Willett et al
as 1:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Darwin Rankin, Kevin Sechrist, Sean Branham and others
Defendant:
Andrew J. Willett, Christopher Loflin, Jose G. Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pronin v. Penry et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Pronin
Defendant:
S Penry, FNU Van Ness, FNU Tenner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00085
Petitioner:
Toby Williams
Defendant:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00213
Petitioner:
Toby Williams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Devenport v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2021cv00225
Plaintiff:
Toby Mack Devenport
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Devenport v. Lumpkin
as 2:2021cv00254
Petitioner:
Toby Mack Devenport
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCoy v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv00505
Plaintiff:
Prince McCoy, Sr.
Defendant:
Bryan Williams, Joanie Fontenot, Jared O'Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grist v. Travis County, Texas et al
as 1:2021cv00886
Plaintiff:
Toby Grist
Defendant:
Travis County, Texas, Alexander Antillon, Anthony Cardinal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
