Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Taft et al v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2023cv04059
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Taft, Jr, Arthur James Triplett, Jr, Jason Lee Cook and others
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Terry Branstad, Kelly Garcia and others
Interested Party:
Robert Thole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Turner et al
as 5:2023cv04054
Interested Party:
Robert Thole
Plaintiff:
Rocky Joe Caldwell
Defendant:
Cory Turner, Everett Fowler, Jared Rapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taft v. Blood et al
as 5:2022cv04066
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Taft, Jr
Defendant:
Aaron Blood, Clint Frederickson, Calvin Carver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Smith v. Jerry Pope, et al
as 12-14376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANDREW SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY POPE, in his individual and official capacity, TONY HENDERSON, In his individual and official capacity, LOUISE WHITE, In her individual and official capacity and others
Smith v. Pope et al
as 5:2012cv00021
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Smith
Defendant:
Jerry Pope, Tony Henderson, Louise White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Henderson
as 1:2011cv02241
Petitioner:
Marco Johnson
Respondent:
Tony Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GONZALEZ v. OWENS
as 3:2010cv00376
Plaintiff:
LEONARD SR GONZALEZ
Defendant:
JAMES OWENS, TONY HENDERSON, MEREDITH IBANEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Henderson et al
as 5:2010cv00312
Plaintiff:
Danny Joseph Wilson
Defendant:
Tony Henderson, Sharon Shavers, Julia Abrams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Davis
as 1:2008cv02874
Petitioner:
William M. Taylor
Respondent:
Tony Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Davis
as 5:2008cv00281
Petitioner:
William M. Taylor
Respondent:
Tony Henderson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
