Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PETTIFORD v. GORDON et al
as 1:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
DERRICK U. PETTIFORD
Defendant:
JAMES G. GORDON, MASON J. HESTER, AUSTIN B. PENDRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FEATHER-GORBEY v. UNKNOWN NAME et al
as 1:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWI FEATHER-GORBEY, MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY, MA-TOC-I-AA-SA and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN NAME and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
FULLARD v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2021cv00742
Petitioner:
REGINALD U. FULLARD
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FULLARD v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA - NOW GOVERNER, et. al. et al
as 1:2020cv00100
Defendant:
ROY COOPER, UNITED STATES, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA - NOW GOVERNER, et. al. and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD U. FULLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FULLARD v. COOPER et al
as 1:2019cv01085
Petitioner:
REGINALD U. FULLARD
Respondent:
ROY COOPER, MR. FIELDS, JR. and KENNETH LASSITER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FULLARD EL BEY v. VALENTINE et al
as 1:2018cv00386
Plaintiff:
REGINALD U. FULLARD EL BEY
Defendant:
B. VALENTINE, C. K. ROBERTSON, LORI SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FULLARD v. STALEY et al
as 1:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
REGINALD U. FULLARD
Defendant:
TWANDA STALEY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, FORSYTH CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00071
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
