Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Salvador (PS) v. USA et al
as 1:2023cv02256
Plaintiff:
Marujo Salvador
Defendant:
USA, Kamala Harris, US DHS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03727
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Salinas v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2019cv18135
Defendant:
US DHS, ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ and KEVIN K. MCALEENAN
Petitioner:
Julio Salinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Adames v. Decker et al
as 1:2018cv11607
Defendant:
Mimi Tsankov, Wen-Ting Cheng, Thomas R. Decker and others
Plaintiff:
Willi Adames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Ibrahima, Sall v. Sessions III et al
as 1:2018cv08091
Plaintiff:
SALL IBRAHIMA
Defendant:
Ronald D. Vitiello, Sheriff Michael Saudino, Director Thomas Decker and others
Respondent:
Michael Saudino, Thomas Decker, Kirstjen Nielsen and others
Petitioner:
Ibrahima, Sall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
