Cases 1 - 10 of 376
Sharma v. Peters et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Sohrab Sharma
Defendant:
Colette Peters and W D Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Posey v. Crabtree et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Steve Allen Posey
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree, Sgt. Anderson and Michael W. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Winston L. Harrison
Defendant:
Bruce Maddox, Marvin W. Wiggins, Erica K. Kemmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pritchett v. Norman (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Lanair Pritchett
Defendant:
Tyler W. Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobson v. Horton
as 4:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
David Otto Jacobson
Respondent:
Jonathan W Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacobson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
Cassandra Johnson, Joseph Michael Willoughby, Jonathan W Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Norton
as 4:2023cv01465
Plaintiff:
Charles Burnett
Defendant:
Jonathan W Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Strawderman v. Norton
as 4:2023cv01456
Petitioner:
Christopher Strawderman
Respondent:
Jonathan W. Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pierce v. Norton
as 4:2023cv01455
Plaintiff:
Steven Pierce
Defendant:
Jonathan W Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacobson v. Horton
as 4:2023cv01317
Petitioner:
David "Otto" Jacobson and David Otto Jacobson
Respondent:
Jonathan W. Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
