Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Maxwell v. Sarpy County Clerk of Court et al
as 8:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Tracy W. Maxwell
Defendant:
Sarpy County Clerk of Court, State of Nebraska, Todd West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welch v. Byrd et al
as 4:2023cv03186
Plaintiff:
Brendan Welch
Defendant:
Eric L. Byrd, Richard S. Holloway, David E. Whitesides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Kahl et al
as 8:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Adrian Gutierrez Martinez
Defendant:
Larry W. Kahl, Don Whitmire, Kris Boe Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalton v. Gable
as 4:2022cv03269
Petitioner:
John W. Dalton, Jr.
Respondent:
Craig Gable
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Kahl et al
as 8:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Adrian Gutierrez Martinez
Defendant:
Larry W. Kahl, Lisa M. Wieble, Stephanie Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Coombs et al
as 4:2022cv03019
Plaintiff:
Eleazar Z. Garcia
Defendant:
David W. Coombs, Jr. and Jacob P. Betsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrrell v. Frakes et al
as 8:2021cv00210
Respondent:
Teresa L. Bittinger, Rosalyn Cotton, Scott Frakes and others
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Gregory Tyrrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wiley v. Lueben et al
as 8:2021cv00033
Defendant:
Dr. Che, Chris, Julie and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Wiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Frakes
as 8:2020cv00458
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Petitioner:
Michael W. Jackson
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hansen v. Keifer
as 8:2020cv00373
Defendant:
James W. Keifer
Plaintiff:
Richard Otto Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
