Cases 1 - 10 of 42
El Bey v. Davis et al.
as 3:2023cv02191
Plaintiff:
Steven Abdul-Azziz El Bey
Defendant:
Mike Davis, Paul Engle, Allison Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ali v. United States
as 1:2023cv01742
Plaintiff:
Rabbi Kohan El-Bey Ali
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohen Andre Marquis Trust et al. v. State of Ohio
as 1:2023cv01939
Plaintiff:
Cohen Andre Marquis Trust and Rabbi Kohan El-Bey Ali
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bibbs et al v. JPAY, L.L.C.
as 2:2023cv02792
Amicus Curiae:
Steven Abdul-Azziz El Bey and Steven L. Smith
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Bibbs and Ronald Leaks
Defendant:
JPAY, L.L.C. and Viapath Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams-El v. State of Ohio
as 3:2023cv01420
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Williams-El
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
El-Bey v. Butler County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
Butler County Jail, Richard K. Jones, Sheriff, Robert Carpenter; 2675 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El Bey v. Branstool
as 2:2023cv01258
Petitioner:
Steven Abdul-Azziz El Bey
Respondent:
Judge W David Branstool
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal El v. Tischler
as 3:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Maurice Neal El
Defendant:
Beth A. Tischler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
El-Bey v. FMC Lexington et al
as 1:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
FMC Lexington and Sgt Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allah v. Chambers Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
El-Barseem K. Allah
Defendant:
Annette Chambers Smith, Ron Erdos, L. Mahlman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
