Cases 1 - 10 of 21
HOMER v. MONZA et al
as 2:2021cv00239
Defendant:
SGT. HARRIS, JENNIFER MONZA, C/O SLADE and others
Plaintiff:
AIDEN HOMER, ELIJAH WINCHESTER and AIDAN HOMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MALARIK v. BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2021cv00194
Defendant:
SGT. LUKEASHA TYSON, BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION, MULTIPLE ROVERS AND and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. MALARIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JACKSON v. ALIQUIPPA CITY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2021cv00008
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN, MRS. WHITE, C/O, MR. MINE, SEWICKLEY BORO POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
ENRICO ANTOINE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. SCHOUPPE et al
as 2:2018cv01319
Plaintiff:
CORY BERNARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WILLIAM SCHOUPPE, ETHEL WHITE and JENNIFER MONZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JACKSON v. SCHOUPPE et al
as 2:2017cv01135
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EUGENE JACKSON, II
Defendant:
WILLIAM SCHOUPPE, JENNIFER MONZA, THOMAS TRKULJA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEEM v. BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00704
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOSEPH DEEM
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY, WILLIAM SCHOUPPE, JENNIFER MONZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KIRKLAND v. SCHOUPPE et al
as 2:2016cv01908
Plaintiff:
TAVON KIRKLAND
Defendant:
WILLIAM SCHOUPPE, CAROL STEELE-SMITH, THOMAS TRKULJA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAROLSKI v. BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD JOSEPH KAROLSKI
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY , WILLIAM SCHOUPPE , CAROL STEELE-SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HURLEY v. SCHOUPPE et al
as 2:2012cv00557
Petitioner:
DANIEL RICHARD HURLEY
Respondent:
WILLIAM SCHOUPPE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. SCHOUPPE et al
as 2:2012cv00298
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. JACKSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM SCHOUPPE, MARIO MONAC and DANTE DECANINI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
