Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Smith v. CCA-CEO-President et al
as 3:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
CCA-CEO-President, Micheal Corlew, Irean Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2016cv03299
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Terry Carter, Ms. (f/n/u) Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv06820
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BERNARD JONES
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, ELIZABETH CONNOLLY, LYNN KOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv06716
Plaintiff:
DARIUS ROBINSON
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, ELIZABETH CONNOLLY, LYNN KOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv06713
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES MITCHELL
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, ELIZABETH CONNOLLY, LYNN KOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv06714
Plaintiff:
JAMES DANIEL HARRIS
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, ELIZABETH CONNOLLY, LYNN KOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv06712
Plaintiff:
ELGIN LOUIS TAYLOR, JR.
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, ELIZABETH CONNOLLY, LYNN KOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRILLO v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv06715
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KENNETH GRILLO
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, ELIZABETH CONNOLLY, LYNN KOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. State of Arkansas
as 2:2012cv02298
Plaintiff:
John Willis Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Secretary, DOC, et al.,
as 2:2011cv00100
Petitioner:
Willie Parker
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
