Cases 1 - 10 of 496
Hebert v. USA
as 5:2024cv00147
Petitioner:
Wayne Francis Hebert
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hovis v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Oreon Tyshon Hovis
Defendant:
Wayne Wilson, FNU Moore, County of Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. USA
as 7:2024cv00363
Petitioner:
Jonathan Wayne Clark
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Riddle v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Riddle
Defendant:
C.J. Wilson, Mark Gouge, William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2024hc02077
Petitioner:
Wayne Porter
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BAKER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
JULIUS WAYNE BAKER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. U.S. Post Office et al
as 5:2024ct03052
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Post Office and Michael Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Fountain, et al.
as 5:2024ct03048
Plaintiff:
Justin Hawkins
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Robert Fountain, Fred Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spann v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Spann
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scarborough v. Harnett County Sheriff's Office et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - All filing should be docketed in 5:24-CT-3040-FL.
as 5:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Angela Scarborough
Defendant:
Harnett County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Wayne Coats, Detective Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
