Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gonzalez v. Bennett et al
as 5:2024ct03139
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Bennett, Theodore Benjamin Lee, Anthony Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Bennett et al - DO NOT FILE ANY DOCUMENTS IN THIS CASE. ALL FILINGS SHOULD BE DOCKETED IN 5:24-CT-3139-FL.
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Bennett, Theodore Benjamin Lee, Anthony Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Reidinger et al
as 3:2023cv00812
Defendant:
David Meyers, Martin Reidinger, Graham Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeCory v. Noem
as 5:2022ct03016
Plaintiff:
William M.A. DeCory
Defendant:
Kristi Noem, Merrick B. Garland, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Anderson v. Dye et al
as 5:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Albert Marquavious Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
Eric Dye, FNU LNU, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Connor et al
as 5:2020ct03076
Defendant:
Gregory Wilkinson and Sgt. Connor
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. WILKINSON et al
as 1:2015cv00907
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
WILKINSON, AGEE, HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. FEDERAL GOV DOC ETC et al
as 1:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
FEDERAL GOV DOC ETC, STATE OF NC DOC, G. BILYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIPPY v. SPENCER et al
as 1:2014cv00886
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. RIPPY, JR.
Defendant:
DONNA HICKS SPENCER, E. D. ALLEN, SCOTT REILLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Obama et al
as 5:2013ct03022
Plaintiff:
Henderson Lewis Hinton
Defendant:
Barak H. Obama, John Roberts, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
