Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Ward v. Carter County Detention Center
as 0:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Ward
Defendant:
Carter County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gaddie v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
LaRico Dwayne Gaddie, Sr.
Defendant:
David Knight, Steven Carter, Darryl Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Mandrell v. Carter County Detention Center
as 0:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
Steven Mandrell
Defendant:
Carter County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. USA
as 5:2022cv00113
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Desmond Carter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McNeal v. Katenbach et al
as 5:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cole McNeal
Defendant:
Tim Katenbach, McCracken County, Jessie Riddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Knight et al
as 5:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jerry Bradford Vaughn
Defendant:
David Knight, Stephen Carter, Darrel Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wimbush et al v. Carter et al
as 5:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lewis Wimbush and Cowboy Dan's Trading Post & Pawn Shop
Defendant:
Detective Carter and Oak Grove Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatmaker et al v. Rockcastle County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2021cv00094
Defendant:
Nathan Carter, Rockcastle County, Kentucky, Suzanne Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Downs and Tristan Winstead
Executor:
Lucy Hatmaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. USP Big Sandy et al
as 7:2021cv00026
Defendant:
A. Carter, J. Price, M. Lefever and others
Plaintiff:
Dijon T. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Federal Medical Center
as 5:2021cv00048
Petitioner:
Corey L. Carter
Respondent:
Federal Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
