Cases 1 - 10 of 484
KING v. LUCUS et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Defendant:
MELANIE DAVIS, DEAN CULLER, HODGIN CARRIE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beckham v. Frank et al
as 3:2024cv00842
Defendant:
FNU Maxiey, FNU Kerns, FNU Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Dayshawn Beckham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Messer et al
as 1:2024cv00233
Defendant:
FNU Galloway, FNU Messer and FNU Cox
Plaintiff:
Jaquan M. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Davis et al
as 5:2024ct03207
Defendant:
Officer Davis, Cherie Oxendine and Lt. Pate
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POLK v. CLARK et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Defendant:
SGT. CLARK, BYRD, CLERANCE F. BIRKHEAD and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CHRISHON POLK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. McFadden et al
as 3:2024cv00716
Defendant:
Falie Louis, RN, Roshaunda Friday, RN, Janika Campbell, CNA and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas, Lessie, Power of Attorney for Jamil Stafford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv00714
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Davis, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Brinson v. Janett et al
as 5:2024ct03167
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Brinson and Jerrod Ivery Brinson
Defendant:
Officer Richardson, Nurse Janett, Officer Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Kelly et al
as 5:2024ct03159
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Williams and Anthony Davis Williams
Defendant:
L.B. Kelly, Ms. Long, City of Raleigh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
CURRY v. DAVIS
as 1:2024cv00486
Defendant:
OFFCIER MR. DAVIS
Plaintiff:
RICKY SHANE CURRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
