Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Handshaw v. Ledbetter et al
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Shone E. Handshaw
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff, Unknown Richards, Unknown Woods and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Gillis et al
as 5:2020cv00158
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzalez and Carlos Ramos Sanchez
Defendant:
Custody Officers John Does 1-8, Sargent Jane Doe, Unit Manager Unknown January and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Lopez v. Woods et al
as 5:2020cv00082
Defendant:
Ms. Gaveet, Mark Woods, Mr. Januery and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Oscar Lopez Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Steele
as 3:2019cv00357
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wood
Defendant:
Ms. Unknown Steele
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. USA
as 1:2019cv00281
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Erin Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wood v. Bolden
as 3:2019cv00297
Defendant:
Tina Bolden
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nathan Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Daniel et al
as 3:2018cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jerome Kendrell Harris
Defendant:
T. Daniel, Unknown Green, Unknown Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pugh v. Green et al
as 5:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
Brandon Pugh
Defendant:
Green, Dorcy, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
Otis Oliver McCray
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Paxton Paige, H. Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. City of Natchez Police Department, et al
as 5:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Casey Shelton Woods
Defendant:
City of Natchez Police Department, Mack James, Danny White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
