Cases 1 - 10 of 201
Young v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Marlo Young
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Warden Lovett and All staff employees in their individual capacities working in receiving and distribution mailroom (R&D) on the Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rose v. West Virginia Division of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rose
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Correction and Rehabilitation, Brenda Ward, Greg Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Young et al
as 5:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Young
Defendant:
Warden D. L. Young, Warden Heckard, B. L. Fain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Young v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00118
Petitioner:
Clark Young
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Young v. Ryle
as 1:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
Antoinette Young
Respondent:
Gretchen Ryle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morgan v. Young et al
as 5:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Dairion E. Morgan
Defendant:
FCI Beckley Warden Young, FCI Beckley Warden Heckard, Doctor Roger Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Nguyen v. Young
as 5:2021cv00676
Petitioner:
Phong Nguyen
Defendant:
D. L. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vance v. Young
as 5:2022cv00004
Petitioner:
Terrence R. Vance
Respondent:
D. L. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Turner v. Young
as 5:2021cv00633
Petitioner:
David Turner
Respondent:
D. L. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Millner v. Young
as 5:2021cv00624
Petitioner:
Clyde Millner
Defendant:
D. L. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
