Cases 1 - 10 of 247
Stephen Plunkett v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1639
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Collette Peters, John P. Yates, Warden and others
Jeffery Henson v. Maharaj Tomar, et al
as 23-3723
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Todd Henson
Defendant:
Maharaj Alejandro Tomar, Doctor, Clinical Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Forrest City Low (originally named as Tomar), John P. Yates, Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Forrest City Low, Neall Jackson, DDS, Dentist, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Forrest City Low (originally named as Jackson) and others
Kenneth Rose v. John Yates
as 23-2698
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Rose
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, Warden
Nestor Tirado-Barbosa v. John Yates
as 23-2592
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nestor Tirado-Barbosa
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, Warden
Kevin Bray v. John Yates
as 23-2148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Brian Bray
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, Warden of FCI-Forrest City (Originally named as USA and Doe)
Jeffery Henson v. Maharaj Tomar, et al
as 23-1489
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeffery Todd Henson
Defendant / Appellee:
Maharaj Alejandro Tomar, Doctor/Clinical Director, FCI-Forrest City Low, John P. Yates, Warden, FCI-Forrest City Low and Collette Peters, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Nathaniel Mitchell v. John Yates
as 23-1389
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nathaniel K. Mitchell
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, Warden, FCI - Forrest City, Arkansas
Ezell v. Hininger, et al
as 23-7007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DAMON HININGER, CEO of Core Civic, JAMES YATES, Warden, Davis Correctional Facility, DEPUTY WARDEN GENTRY and others
David Mero v. Yates
as 22-3649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Mero
Defendant / Appellee:
Yates, Warden
Rogelio Guevara v. John Yates
as 22-2500
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rogelio Guevara
Defendant / Appellee:
John P. Yates, Warden, FCI-Forrest City
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
