Cases 1 - 10 of 3,192
White v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Ladonte White
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
John Leslie Young
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Banister et al
as 4:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
James Wright
Defendant:
Terri Banister, Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deere v. West et al
as 3:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Amber Nicole Deere
Defendant:
Mallory West, James Carter, David West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Catlett v. West et al
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Angela Catlett
Defendant:
Mallory West, James Carter, David West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boman v. Zimmerman et al
as 6:2024cv06079
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewaine Boman
Defendant:
Parole Officer Zimmerman, Parole Officer Starky and John Doe Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goshade v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Joshua I Goshade
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romine v. Washington County et al
as 5:2024cv05114
Plaintiff:
Jacob Stanton Romine
Defendant:
Washington County, Doe Washington County Prosecutors and Doe Employees Fayetteville Animal Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Does
as 4:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Corey L Ellis
Defendant:
Does Mark/Scott, Owners, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Ty, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Employee, Loose Change Coin Laundry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. McClean et al
as 4:2024cv04051
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Smith, Jr and Curtis Wayne Dale Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Joan McClean, Officer Todd Tallant, Does Badge Number 11-6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
