Cases 1 - 10 of 838
Ridley v. Vanihel et al
as 3:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Daren Earl Ridley and Daren E Ridley
Defendant:
Frank Vanihel, K Gilmore, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Worden et al
as 3:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
William James Ray
Defendant:
T Worden, Snow, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
ARAMARK, GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERON v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
CAMERONS PETERON
Defendant:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN, FLOWER'S DORM REP, CO'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayberry v. Buss et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Timothy Marcus Mayberry
Defendant:
Edwin G Buss, Jane/John Doe 1, Jane/John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTHRAUFF v. CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC. et al
as 2:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
MARK RUTHRAUFF
Defendant:
CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC., CENTURION, LLC., STEPHANY LYNNE RILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flohr v. Jeff Siegel et al
as 3:2024cv00415
Defendant:
ROBERT FLOHR, Elkhart County Sheriff Jeff Siegel, John Does/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLLIVER v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
THEOTIS D. TOLLIVER
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Mawhorr et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Kameron Hawkins
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Dan Mawhorr, Conrad Dyer, Cody Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bure v. Gann et al
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Bure
Defendant:
C Gann, Erin Williams, Smiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
